The Players Had A Non-Exclusive Implied License by Weismart Weismart - 1 year ago | 217 The court held that no reasonable lay person could conclude that the tattoos featured within the match are substantially-similar to those featured on the bodies of the real players. In supporting that holding, Judge Swain discovered that the pictures of the tattoos were twisted to a degree and were too modest in scale to matter (a mere 4.4% to 10.96percent of the size of the actual things). Not just that, but just three out of 400 players featured in the match had tattoos which were at controversy. Read more 0 0
